Read in the Toronto Sun today about 2 people charged in the killing of a homeless person. (That's the politically correct term now right? I am not allowed to say "Human refuse"? or "Rat-attractor"?)
The two people were also "Domicile inhibited".
The opening line in the article was:
2 homeless people charged in slaying at a rubbing alcohol party gone wrong.
Ummmmmm, okay.
Since I have never been to a good rubbing alcohol party, (I blame it on my mom, she never introduced me to the 'right' people), good or bad, I cannot be sure what about this party made it bad.
Were there no finger foods?
Were there finger foods and napkins were not provided?
Was the music in poor taste?
Did that quiet girl from accounting have a little too much to drink and throw herself at the ugliest guy in the room? Give him a lapdance?
Or was it the fact that it was a party that somehow revolved around rubbing alcohol???
Since the newspaper statement was so ambiguous, I can only assume someone showed up at the 'rubbing alcohol party' with the wrong kind of rubbing alcohol. Like the Presidents choice brand.
It would be as if i went to a fancy wine party and brought wine in a box and put it beside the vintage 1922 Bordeaux.
'What a faux pas' they whisper behind my back. Oh I can hear them, thinking they are so special.
*Now this does not mean I am making light of the fact that a woman died. This is a ??? against the people who write the newspaper.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment